Monday, October 04, 2004

Ashish snaps back.. :-o

Psuedo Reality (PR) is as much real as it is psuedo (if not more). I tend to agree with Mudit's first interpretation of PR. And would extend it to say that , Every one lives in a psuedo-real world, build by her own interpretation of the events /objects/.. around her. Real world is infact a manifestation of interplay within 6 billions of this psuedo worlds. You can even recall the matrix trilogy and make your assertions/myths ...but if you are the one you ll establish all psuedo worlds and deal with them in person.

Itty,

Your comment make an interesting read. Infact it leaves me with a lot of questions about Pseudo-Reality (the way you define it ...)

Is it a system...??? What are the other parts/links in the system.
Are society's restrictions mandatory??? ...Or, is it a deliberate choice to follow them. If yes, then why?...

Are the "distortions" really deliberate??? if yes why isn't the a deliberate effort to defeat the very reason why one needs these distortions (by breaking away from society/ setting your own rules and definitions of life)

If answer to both the questions is "yes", then there are two deliberate choices one makes. First, to live in a (real/pseudo-real/pseudo) Society, and, then to deceit herself out of it. Why not just make one deliberate effort and leave the realms of the society???...Isn't it that, like two NOTs make one Yes, these two deliberate choices of negation by one, makes for her refusal to live by her own rules and definitions of life.

Is society itself a pseudo-real world???

Is there a single Pseudo-Real world??? (A Universal Set or a Large set, of which the group of idealists is a subset. If PR is not a Universal Set, what is "not PR", and what links the two systems (Assuming, there is no Intersection Set defined....check me on this assumption)
How do you define Ideology Again if Idealist are assumed to be brainwashed,(Are the ones assuming this, live in pseudo-real/real/ world??),and steeped in pseudo-reality....is ideal world actually a pseudo-real??? (Giving it a status of somewhat real !!). And if Idealist are those defined as people who live by the rules of society, aren't these the ones who are NOT living in pseudo reality (following the above corollary of two negations/choices, and hence should not be the part of the PR set anyways).

I'm so confused ...is perception a reality ?

And finally ...is this the only way pseudo-reality is defined (distortions of reality, taking herself away from society) or there are more pseudo-realities defined. Is there a pseudo-real system defined of which humans are not a part.

Hope "Mudit" can clarify ...

3 Comments:

At 8:46 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Itty... plz comment.. even i am very curious to see this discussion comclude.. and let peace prevail on this earth

 
At 3:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that all others are jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself."
-- Henry Mencken

 
At 5:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and some people dont like to be a "jackass" (Strange !!)

"If I became a philosopher, if I have so keenly sought this fame for which I'm still waiting, it's all been to seduce women...basically"
- Jean-Paul Sartre

 

Post a Comment

<< Home